Concert V Program Notes
by
Robert Hurwitz
David
Crumb
(b 1962)
Vestiges of a Distant
Time
On occasion, while traveling to regions where ancient
civilizations once stood, I have felt haunted by vestigial spirits from
distant times. While exploring such places as old city Jerusalem, or
strolling among ancient Mayan ruins, this nebulous feeling of being
surrounded by the ghosts of antiquity, whether real or imagined, inspired
me to compose the tone poem Vestiges of a Distant Time.
Conceptually, the piece evolves out of a simple yet evocative
three-chord modal progression introduced near the beginning. To me, this
pseudo-Renaissance progression feels ancient and nostalgic; the special
sound of the Oboe d'amore is used to enhance this character. The
three-chord progression continues to serve as the primary thread of the
piece, propelling the music forward through strings of sequences that
ultimately lead to an effusive dance-like music. Just as this music
reaches an exhilarating point of climax, there is an abrupt interruption,
marking a return to the melancholy descending line of the opening bars.
Originally commissioned by the Cumberland Valley Chamber Players,
a chamber orchestra based in rural
Pennsylvania at Wilson College, Vestiges
of a Distant Time was premiered in April 1996. In fall 2003, I decided to
substantially re-orchestrate the work, releasing it in a version for full
symphony orchestra.
-- Notes on Vestiges of a Distant Time by the composer
Franz
Joseph Haydn
(1732-1809)
Cello Concerto No. 1 in C
Major, Hob:VIIb:1
Haydn's Cello Concerto in C Major was probably written for
Joseph Weigl, first cellist of the Esterhazy orchestra between 1761 and
1769. Haydn composed this concerto sometime between 1761 and 1765, during
his early years of employment with the Esterhazy family. It thus dates
from the time of his earliest symphonies, including the famous works
nicknamed "Le Matin, Le Midi and Le
Soir".
The concerto was listed in a catalog Haydn had made of his works,
but it remained unknown for nearly two centuries until it was discovered
in 1961 at the National Museum in Prague by Oldrich Pulkert, a Czech
musicologist and a librarian at the museum. Only one set of orchestral
parts, copied in what is probably Weigl's hand, survived, but there is no
doubt concerning the work's authenticity. It has in recent years
become Haydn's most popular concerto, and one of the most performed works
in the cello repertoire.
The concerto is written in the traditional fast-slow-fast style,
beginning with a moderato movement
in which the main theme is slightly
varied each time it appears. The lovely central adagio
is scored for the
soloist and the strings only. The final allegro molto
requires a cellist
with abundant virtuosic powers. Filled with melodic invention, the
movement provides an energetic conclusion to this delightful work.
Wolfgang
Amadeus Mozart (
1756-1791)
Sinfonia Concertante in E
Flat, K.297b
The Sinfonia Concertante in E Flat for Oboe, Clarinet, Bassoon and
Horn dates from Mozart's visit to Paris in 1778. It was written in
the same period as the Sinfonia Concertante for Violin and Viola and the
Concerto for Two Pianos, both also in the key of E flat, as well as the
Concerto for Flute and Harp.
As is the case with a number of other of Mozart's works, the
Sinfonia Concertante for winds has a curious history. It was originally
written for four specific soloists, whom Mozart named in a letter to his
father, but the instruments he mentioned were flute, oboe, horn and
bassoon.
What became of the work in this form is unknown. Due probably to
the numerous musical intrigues permeating Paris at this time, the
composition, written to be presented at the Concerts
Spirituels,
was never
performed. Mozart likely sold the solo parts to Le Gros, the director of
the Concerts Spirituels, an assumption supported by the following
excerpt from another letter to Mozart's father: "He [Le Gros]
thinks that he alone has them [the parts] but he is wrong, for they are
still fresh in my mind, and, as soon as I get home, I shall write them
down again."
Did Mozart actually write down the Sinfonia Concertante once he
reached home? This is doubtful, for nothing was heard of the work for the
following hundred years. Finally, the score of a piece for oboe,
clarinet, horn and bassoon was discovered by the Mozart biographer Otto
Jahn in 1886. Was this version a revision of the Paris original, penned
by Mozart at some later date, or was it an arrangement (or even a wholly
new composition) by someone else? The copy Jahn obtained was not
authenticated, but following its publication in 1886 many Mozart scholars
accepted it as genuine.
The true facts may never be known. Although the work is in many
ways highly characteristic of Mozart's Parisian style, questions
were continually asked. By the 1960s, many experts had downgraded the
Concertante to the status of an "attributed work."
In the 1980s, the musicologist, fortepianist and Mozart scholar
Robert Levin, having become convinced that the solo parts were indeed
genuine Mozart, undertook a scholarly restoration, assuming that someone
other than Mozart had transcribed the solo parts for the new
instrumentation and had created the missing orchestral score. It is Mr.
Levin's version of the Concertante that OMP will be performing today.
After bringing out his edition of the flute-oboe-horn-bassoon
version, Levin wrote a 500-page book on the still uncertain background of
this work: Who Wrote the Mozart Four-Wind Concertante?
(Pendragon Press,
1988).
The music of the Concertante is forthright and tuneful from first
bar to last, and a marvelously effective vehicle for the four soloists.
The first movement, following a somewhat pompous opening, is alive with
fine melodies. The second is a spacious Adagio, while the finale consists
of a highly appealing set of virtuoso variations on the effervescent theme
that enters at the outset.
Concert
VI Program Notes
Sergei Prokofiev
(1891-1953)
"Classical" Symphony
Prokofiev's conducting teacher at the St. Petersburg Conservatory,
Nicholas Tcherepnine, was in an indirect way responsible for the creation
of the "Classical" Symphony. During Prokofiev's time at the conservatory,
Tcherepnine had brought to his attention many of the subtleties of the
Classical style, which caused him to acquire a special taste for it. Then
in 1916, two years after his graduation, when the young composer began
work on his first symphony, he found himself fascinated by the challenge
of writing a work in the style of Haydn. "It seemed to me that had Haydn
lived to our day he would have retained his own style while accepting
something of the new at the same time. That was the kind of symphony I
wanted to write; a symphony in classical style. And when I saw that my
idea was beginning to work, I called it the Classical Symphony---in the
first place because that was simpler, and secondly, for the fun of
it."
Simplicity and fun appropriately describe the symphony. Each of
its movements is written in a transparent and accessible style that boasts
all of the clarity of a Haydn symphony. In the work, too, is the subtle
humor typical of Haydn's works in this genre. The first movement is a
high-spirited allegro in a clear Sonata form. The slow movement is like a
song, which alternates lyrical and playful sections. The Gavotte is full
of the humor Haydn infused into his symphonic third movements, while the
finale is an even more spirited and sprightly molto vivace, which rushes
all the way to its conclusion in a flamboyant flourish.
W.A. Mozart (1756-1791)
Exsultate, Jubilate K. 165
The first composition of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart which today still
ranks as a masterpiece was the brilliant motet for soprano Exsultate,
jubilate (K. 165). Composed when Mozart was just sixteen, the work received
its first performance on January 17, 1773, in the Church of San Antonio,
Milan, shortly before Mozart turned 17 years of age.
Wolfgang and his father, Leopold, had traveled to Milan in October
1772 for the premiere of his opera Lucio Silla, in which the famous
castrato Venanzio Rauzzini was assigned a leading role. Exactly why Mozart
composed Exsultate, jubilate for Rauzzini and not for a female soprano,
remains unclear, but surely Rauzzini's extraordinary ability, as evidenced
by the dazzling virtuosity of the piece and its demanding, coloratura
style seem a convincing reason. In this work Mozart combines the aria and
recitative style of opera with the tripartate form of the Italian
symphony, the movements of which have tempos that are fast, slow, and fast
respectively to produce what is truly a three movement vocal concerto.
The work opens with an Allegro in F major, followed by a slower,
more lyrical Andante in A major that is preceded by a recitative. The
concluding movement, Molto Allegro in F major, is the brilliant and famous
Alleluia, a favorite of Mozart devotees worldwide.
Franz Schubert (1797-1828)
Salve Regina Op. 47 in F Major D. 223
The words of the Latin hymn "Salve Regina" are probably by
Hermannus Contractus, a monk whose own musical setting of the text still
survives. It was originally performed antiphonally and it became known as
the Antiphon of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Although the original plainsong
still exists, composers from Palestrina onwards have used the words for
elaborate musical settings.
Schubert wrote seven settings of the text at different times of
his life. On July 5, 1815 Schubert composed his third setting of the text,
in F major, for soprano solo, strings (no violas) and organ.
Schubert's brother, Ferdinand, wanted him to add parts for
wind instruments (clarinets, bassoons and horns) to give an orchestral
flavor to the accompaniment. For this purpose he made a copy of
Schubert's score, and finally, on January 28, 1823, Schubert added the
wind parts to it.
Diabelli used this version as the source for publication. Its
title, "Second Offertory, Op. 47," was due to the fact that
Diabelli was about to publish a companion piece by Schubert, the
"Totus in corde," as "First Offertory." The fact that the
"Totus in corde" was called "first," given opus number 46, and was
composed and published after the "second" has created confusion between
these two works in lists of compositions by Schubert.
On September 8, 1825, the music was premiered in the Maria-Trost
Kirche in Vienna.
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Piano Concerto No. 2, Op.19
The chronology of Beethoven's works is generally indicated by
the order in which they were published. Occasionally, however, the dates
of composition and publication do not match. This is the case with the
earliest of Beethoven's five mature piano concertos, the one
that carries the heading "No. 2." (In fact, there were two
earlier piano concertos, written when the composer was twelve and fourteen
years of age respectively, one of which has survived only in the form of a
complete first movement.)
The B Flat concerto was completed early in 1795 and had its first
performance in Vienna in March of that year, with the composer at the
piano. Beethoven played it again in Prague three years later in a
completely revised version, and it is this version that is commonly heard
today.
The composer was himself not entirely satisfied with this work,
which he regarded as a product of his youth. Nevertheless, he allowed it
to be published, and although he accepted only ten ducats for it, he
admitted to the publisher that "it will not disgrace you to print
it." In fact, although couched firmly in the Haydn/Mozart idiom that
was soon to be surpassed, the work gives ample evidence of the genius of
its creator, and often betrays some unique qualities of style would soon
become hallmarks of Beethoven's compositional procedure.
The initial movement, marked allegro con brio, betrays several of
these characteristics ... the rapid juxtaposition of dramatic and lyrical
musical material, the sudden shift in tonality by modulation up a half
step, and the surprising modulation to a distant tonality (as in the
second subject, which suddenly, but gently, moves from F major to D Flat
major). The adagio, although simple in formal design, is conceived with
great emotional power. The finale is a bright, straightforward and cheery
rondo, the refrain of which employs that characteristic short-long
rhythmic figure known variously as Lombard rhythm, Hungarian rhythm or
Scotch Snap.
W.A. Mozart (1756-1791)
Mass in C, K.167
The sacred music from Mozart's years in Salzburg divides
roughly into three periods. The earliest works include four masses
written before his first visit to Italy. His sojourns in Italy with his
father served as a second apprenticeship, and he was especially influenced
by the tuition of Padre Martini, Europe's leading pedagogue in music
history, theory and sacred music, with whom he studied counterpoint.
Following his return to Salzburg, Mozart wrote nine Masses, the
first of which was K. 167, the "Trinity" Mass. All of these
Masses were constrained by an order from Archbishop Colloredo,
Mozart's employer, to restrict musical settings of the full Mass to a
maximum of forty-five minutes. For this reason, Mozart was forced to
limit the amount of counterpoint he employed and to reduce the overall
duration by at times composing two texts to be sung simultaneously by two
or more voices. In many of these Masses the longer texts of the Gloria
and Credo could not be subdivided into too many separate movements.
Mozart completed the Missa in honorem Sanctissime
Trinitatis in
June of 1773. The Mass has a number of distinctive features. Its title
and festive key (C Major) suggest that it was intended for the Feast of
the Trinity. The scoring, including four festive trumpets, at the same
time excludes violas, apparently a Salzburg tradition that Mozart was to
repeat in all his complete masses to come. K.167 is Mozart's only
mass not requiring vocal soloists. Despite the restrictions on size noted
above, Mozart was able, by creating a short Kyrie and Gloria, to compose
an extended Credo, with five movements and seven changes of tempo, ending
with a joyous fugue. The setting of the et incarnatus est is especially
beautiful. Scored for unaccompanied chorus at the moment of incarnation
(ex Maria Virgine) it also provides extreme chromaticism at the word
Crucifixus. Throughout the work there is a good deal of dynamic contrast
and variety, including a rare crescendo in the Agnus Dei.


|